I was so excited to see Dunkirk, it's based on a true event, it doesn't surpass the 2hr mark, and the cast is incredible. It didn't disappoint. Last night before we watched the film, I had a little look at the previous 30 titles I've seen this year, and I'm delighted to let you know, this takes the top spot. I know a lot of the big titles often come out around the back end of the year/beginning of next year due to the awards season, but actually, 2017 has given me a lot of bang average films (hit me up with your suggestions of 2017 winners I haven't seen if you fancy.) This movie was captivating, interesting, emotional, full of action. It really was fab. It also has Tom Hardy in it (and my new friend Jack Lowden...).
The film encapsulates the evacuation of Dunkirk (it sounds Scottish but turns out it's in France) from 3 different view points- land, sea and air. On the beach we follow Tommy (Fionn Whitehead) and his mute mate as they try to battle through the troops to grab a spot on a boat nipping back to England. Amongst setbacks and breakthroughs, they find Harry Styles, and we finally discover the real reason why he cut his hair off all those months ago. On water, Mr Dawson (Mark Rylance) is giving the Navy a hand by travelling across to Dunkirk on his private boat with his son and son's friend, in order to help bring some troops back. From the skies, we follow Farrier (Hardy) and Collins (Lowden) as they support troops on air attack on the bomb dropping enemies, fighting against limited fuel. To add to the interest of the plot, we follow the story from 3 different time perspectives; a week on land, a day on a boat, and just an hour in the air. These time frames cleverly match up as we reach the climax of the film.
The film also really followed the British way of life, and anytime a soldier had any kind of break or respite, they were offered a brew. 'Don't worry love go down there there's tea!' 'Go down stairs and grab yourself a brew and a blanket'. A sentiment I can wholly get on board with.
As you can see by the fact I am using proper bulky paragraphs, and not twiddly sentences, I was really encapsulated by the plot and it really held my interest, especially as we switched between the 3 plots. The script was very small, with very little dialogue, but it wasn't needed. The story told itself between the fabulous acting, the tension, the music, the sound effects and the cinematography. I could go on. The cast itself is full of well known, credible actors (Rylance, Hardy, Kenneth Branagh, Cillian Murphy) and some new faces, but the acting was incredible, and the whole thing was casted really well. I thought Styles would be in it for promotion reasons, or just because he's Harry Styles and he can do what he wants. Apparently he was cast out of 1000s of hopefuls and Christopher Nolan had no idea who he was (everyone knows who Harry Styles is???).
To add to that point, everyone had great cheekbones. Really lovely ones. It was a sight to see. I reckon someone in the makeup department must have had an eye out with all those sharp and edgy faces. However, my one disappointment was Tom Hardy. Almost the entire film he spent hiding behind his Bane mask, until the final scenes. What a tease, and what a waste of an excellent face. Spoiler alert but you essentially have to wait until the end of the movie for him to unmask and reveal his chiselled by angels face.
Overall, I very clearly loved the film. Full of non-stop action and emotion, not bulked out with meaningless romance, or sexism, or silly humour. Get yourself to the pictures to watch it, where you can really find yourself in the film, with the loud effects and great quality screen. It's my must watch of the summer!!! My only gripe being that Tom Hardy's face needed to be in it more, it's a 9.5/10 from me. Go and watch as soon as you can.
Showing posts with label War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War. Show all posts
Thursday, 3 August 2017
Saturday, 11 February 2017
9. Hacksaw Ridge
As you may already know, I do love a film based on a true story. I'd seen the advert for Hacksaw Ridge, and thought it looked interesting, but war and fighting and armies and what-not are not my favourite. However, this story follows a pacifist who joins the army, so from the offset I'm liking the morals!
The story follows Desmond Doss (Andrew Garfield), as he joins the army to become a medic. To gain this qualification, he needs to pass all his basic training, including shooting with a rifle. This task is particularly difficult for Doss, as he refuses to touch a gun. The rest of the troop now no longer trust him to save him in the battle field, and he is subject to abuse. Alongside this, Doss is planning a marriage to Dorothy (Teresa Palmer) so you could say he'd got a lot on.
I found the story interesting, although cheesy in parts, and liked the fact that it drew on the parts of Doss' (Andrew Garfield) childhood, and found the flashbacks really effective in the storytelling, and in empathising with the character. I also really loved the humour in the film, Vince Vaughn is hilarious as Sergeant Howell, and there were lots of 'laugh out loud' moments in the film which I wasn't expecting. At the end, we see some real life footage, and illustrating that there was jokes and fun, even in such a bleak situation, which I found heartwarming.
Up to here, it all sounds glowing, and that's to be assumed as this is another of our Oscar nominated films. However, there were some bits about this film that weren't for me. At one point there is a battle scene for about 20 minutes with no particular plot, and there isn't even an interesting tactic which either side of the war are using. It's just a scene of fighting and gruesome gore, but neither of those things excite me. In my head, I'm very aware that the gore is all fake, so no matter how realistic it is, I'm quite desensitised. In fact, I flinched more in an earlier scene where Doss was having his blood taken (and I give blood myself!). I also find fighting and violence really boring, so it was not the one for me. In a later battle scene, it was really exciting and there was a real threat and use of intelligence and innovation to evade the enemy, which I did enjoy, but I feel like the first scene was unnecessary. However I do get that that is something people enjoy, so if you're into all that, you'll like it.
The other thing I didn't like about this film was the length. I felt like I'd been sat in my chair for days and I think the story could be told just as effectively in 1hr 50, as opposed to 2hr 20. We're almost getting into Wolf of Wall Street territory (although I did love that film).
Overall, I enjoyed Hacksaw Ridge, but I wouldn't be throwing it any Oscars. The romance was cheesy, the violence was mindless, but there was a good and interesting story buried beneath it all. I'd give it a 7/10, but if you're into war and battles and fighting, you'll probably love it.
The story follows Desmond Doss (Andrew Garfield), as he joins the army to become a medic. To gain this qualification, he needs to pass all his basic training, including shooting with a rifle. This task is particularly difficult for Doss, as he refuses to touch a gun. The rest of the troop now no longer trust him to save him in the battle field, and he is subject to abuse. Alongside this, Doss is planning a marriage to Dorothy (Teresa Palmer) so you could say he'd got a lot on.
I found the story interesting, although cheesy in parts, and liked the fact that it drew on the parts of Doss' (Andrew Garfield) childhood, and found the flashbacks really effective in the storytelling, and in empathising with the character. I also really loved the humour in the film, Vince Vaughn is hilarious as Sergeant Howell, and there were lots of 'laugh out loud' moments in the film which I wasn't expecting. At the end, we see some real life footage, and illustrating that there was jokes and fun, even in such a bleak situation, which I found heartwarming.
Up to here, it all sounds glowing, and that's to be assumed as this is another of our Oscar nominated films. However, there were some bits about this film that weren't for me. At one point there is a battle scene for about 20 minutes with no particular plot, and there isn't even an interesting tactic which either side of the war are using. It's just a scene of fighting and gruesome gore, but neither of those things excite me. In my head, I'm very aware that the gore is all fake, so no matter how realistic it is, I'm quite desensitised. In fact, I flinched more in an earlier scene where Doss was having his blood taken (and I give blood myself!). I also find fighting and violence really boring, so it was not the one for me. In a later battle scene, it was really exciting and there was a real threat and use of intelligence and innovation to evade the enemy, which I did enjoy, but I feel like the first scene was unnecessary. However I do get that that is something people enjoy, so if you're into all that, you'll like it.
The other thing I didn't like about this film was the length. I felt like I'd been sat in my chair for days and I think the story could be told just as effectively in 1hr 50, as opposed to 2hr 20. We're almost getting into Wolf of Wall Street territory (although I did love that film).
Overall, I enjoyed Hacksaw Ridge, but I wouldn't be throwing it any Oscars. The romance was cheesy, the violence was mindless, but there was a good and interesting story buried beneath it all. I'd give it a 7/10, but if you're into war and battles and fighting, you'll probably love it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)